Which diagnostic test is used to confirm the diagnosis of maxillary and frontal sinusitis?

  • PDFView PDF

Which diagnostic test is used to confirm the diagnosis of maxillary and frontal sinusitis?

Which diagnostic test is used to confirm the diagnosis of maxillary and frontal sinusitis?

Under a Creative Commons license

Open access

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of sinus ultrasound for acute and subacute maxillary sinusitis (ASMS) by investigating the agreement between different tools. We also proposed a confirmatory tool directed protocol for adult acute sinusitis, to enhance diagnostic accuracy.

Methods

This prospective cohort study enrolled patients who were older than 18 years, with a diagnosis of maxillary sinusitis. The duration of symptoms was confined to less than 12 weeks. Rigid nasal endoscopy, sinus ultrasound, and plain sinus film were performed for all patients on the same day to confirm the diagnosis. Kappa statistics were used to test interrater reliability.

Results

A total of 148 maxillary sinuses in 74 patients (38 men, 36 women) were evaluated. Sinus ultrasound and rigid nasal endoscopy disclosed the best agreement (agreement = 0.78, κ = 0.556). The agreement of rigid nasal endoscopy and plain sinus film was relatively poor (agreement = 0.72, κ = 0.446). Sinus ultrasound and plain sinus film had the poorest diagnostic consistency (agreement = 0.67, κ = 0.338).

Conclusion

Sinus ultrasound is a quick, safe, cost effective, and relatively easy-to-use technique for clinicians to evaluate the maxillary sinus. Sinus ultrasound and rigid nasal endoscopy are complementary tests to confirm the diagnosis of ASMS.

Keywords

Acute and subacute maxillary sinusitis

Plain sinus film

Rigid nasal endoscope

Sinus computed tomography

Sinus ultrasound

Cited by (0)

© 2018 the Chinese Medical Association. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.

Acute sinusitis, which is defined as inflammation of the sinuses for less than 8 weeks in adults and less than 12 weeks in children, can occur as a single, independent entity.

From: Minor Emergencies (Second Edition), 2007

Sinusitis

John E. Bennett MD, in Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, 2020

Antimicrobial

Antibacterial agents are the primary therapy for acute bacterial sinusitis. In the past 40 years there have been numerous randomized, placebo-controlled trials of antimicrobials in patients with sinusitis. When evaluating the quality of such studies, it is imperative to consider the diagnostic criteria used to enter patients into the trial. If the diagnosis is made on clinical grounds but criteria for subject entry are too liberal, a large number of patients will be included who have viral URI rather than bacterial disease. This will bias the trial toward showing a lack of effectiveness of antibacterial agents.

There has been a recent trend in the literature to publish studies that mimic the “real-world” office setting in which the practitioner is making the diagnosis of sinusitis based on clinical criteria that are not stringent and without any kind of microbiologic confirmation.Table 62.6 summarizes randomized, placebo-controlled trials of antimicrobials in the treatment of sinusitis.105–122 These trials have shown variable benefit to antibiotics over placebo. In one study, in which clinical criteria such as purulent nasal discharge for at least 2 days and pus visualized on rhinoscopy were required for entry, 40% of patients included in the study had normal radiographs, strongly suggesting that these patients did not have sinusitis.112

Further complicating the interpretation of antimicrobial efficacy studies is the fact that patients with sinusitis will have a high rate of spontaneous improvement within 2 weeks of presentation. Studies that included patients who had more severe or prolonged symptoms (i.e., >10 days) or those that used adjunctive diagnostic tests to confirm the diagnosis of sinusitis were more likely to show a benefit to antimicrobials versus placebo.105,108,118,119,121 When patients enrolled in efficacy studies are followed closely over time, those who received antimicrobials show a more rapid improvement in symptoms compared with patients receiving placebo (Fig. 62.3). A recent trial of amoxicillin-clavulanate versus placebo in children, in which sinusitis was diagnosed based on careful clinical criteria in an office setting, demonstrated a cure or improvement in 64% of patients receiving antibiotic compared with 32% of those receiving placebo.121

Several meta-analyses of clinical trials of antimicrobials in sinusitis have been published. These analyses have consistently found a benefit for antimicrobials over placebo despite much heterogeneity in the diagnostic methods, exclusion criteria, and outcome measures found within the studies that were included (Table 62.7). Overall, antimicrobial agents reduce the rate of clinical failure by 25% to 30% within 7 to 14 days of initiating therapy.123 In most studies evaluating the role of antimicrobials, the adverse event rate is higher in the antibiotic arm of the study. Diarrhea is the most common adverse event noted and is usually self-limited.

Paranasal Sinus Diseases

Axel Ruprecht, Ernest W.N. Lam, in Oral Radiology (Seventh Edition), 2014

Clinical Features.

Acute sinusitis is the most common of the sinus conditions that cause pain and is often a complication of the common cold. After a few days, nasal congestion accompanied by a clear discharge can increase, and the patient may complain of pain and tenderness to pressure or swelling over the involved sinus. The pain may also be referred to the premolar and molar teeth on the affected side and these teeth may develop sensitivity to percussion. In the case of a bacterial sinusitis, a green or greenish yellow discharge may accompany the other aforementioned signs and symptoms. In such circumstances, it is important that the teeth be ruled out as a possible source of the pain or infection.

Chronic maxillary sinusitis is a sequela of an acute infection that fails to resolve by 3 months. Generally, no external signs occur except during periods of acute exacerbations when increased pain and discomfort are apparent. Chronic sinusitis may develop with anatomic derangements, including deviation of the nasal septum and the presence of concha bullosa (pneumatization of the middle concha) that inhibit the outflow of mucus, or with allergic rhinitis, asthma, cystic fibrosis, and dental infections.

Read full chapter

URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780323096331000262

Approach to the Patient with Nose, Sinus, and Ear Disorders

Lee Goldman MD, in Goldman-Cecil Medicine, 2020

Differential Diagnosis, Sinusitis

Sinusitis must be differentiated from rhinitis. Sinusitis may be caused by viral infection, bacterial infection, fungal infection, and allergy (Table 398-4).

A rapid onset of sinus-related symptoms suggests a viral upper respiratory infection, especially if the patient also has typical systemic symptoms, such as arthralgia, myalgia, fever, chills, gastrointestinal symptoms, and cough in addition to nasal congestion, postnasal drip, and headache. By comparison, acute bacterial rhinosinusitis causes facial pressure and purulent postnasal discharge. Viral disease can progress to a secondary bacterial infection, which can become chronic. An acute onset of inhalant allergy is often seasonal or can be traced to a particular precipitant.

Chronic sinusitis is a term that encompasses multiple pathophysiologic mechanisms and implies a prolonged course of sinus symptoms that have been refractory to symptomatic treatment over a period of at least 3 months. Chronic sinusitis presents with nasal congestion, nasal drainage, facial pressure,and sometimes anosmia (seeTable 398-2). In contrast to acute (infectious) sinusitis, headaches are an unusual manifestation of either perennial rhinitis (allergic or nonallergic) or chronic sinusitis, and virtually all patients who complain of “sinus headaches” suffer from atypical migraines (Chapter 370), headaches that occur in a bilateral distribution involving the maxillary or ophthalmic branches of the trigeminal nerve. This distribution, especially when it is combined with vasomotor symptoms such as nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, and conjunctival injection, often leads to misdiagnosis as chronic sinusitis or rhinitis. Because of this overlap in symptoms among chronic sinusitis, perennial rhinitis, and atypical migraines and their synergistic influences on each other, objective evaluation with either CT or rhinoscopy is usually required to establish the diagnosis of chronic sinusitis (Table 398-5).

Endoscopically guided culture techniques combined with CT are the best way to diagnose or excludeinfectious sinusitis. CT can reveal mucoceles, which are blocked individual sinuses that continue to secrete mucus and can slowly erode bone, expand to involve the eye and brain, or become acutely infected. A mycetoma, which is an isolated “fungus ball” in a sinus, has a characteristic hyperdensity within a sinus opacification. Mycetomas (Chapter 322) are noninvasive but may erode bone through pressure necrosis over a long period.

Mucus retention cysts, often present in the maxillary sinus, are manifested as a spherical opacification; an estimated 10% of the population has a mucus retention cyst, which is usually asymptomatic.

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Rhinitis

Antihistamines are considered first-line therapy for allergic rhinitis because they reduce rhinorrhea even though they do not generally improve nasal congestion. Episodic symptoms are treated with oral or nasal H1-antihistamines, with an oral or nasal decongestant if needed. Mild seasonal or perennial symptoms should be treated with an intranasal glucocorticoid, an oral or nasal H1-antihistamine, or a leukotriene-receptor antagonist. Moderate-to-severe symptoms are treated with an intranasal glucocorticoid, an intranasal glucocorticoid plus a nasal H1-antihistamine, or allergen immunotherapy.

The benefit of antihistamines diminishes in patients with continuous allergen exposures, such as perennial allergic rhinitis caused by indoor allergens or after several days of continuous exposure to seasonal allergens; in such settings, these drugs often prove to be little better than placebo.3

Second-generation antihistamines have a long duration of action and are nonsedating. These once-daily agents include cetirizine (10 mg), levocetirizine (5 mg), fexofenadine (180 mg), desloratadine (5 mg), and loratadine (10 mg). The intranasal antihistamines azelastine and olopatadine have a more rapid onset of action than oral antihistamines and also are effective for nonallergic forms of rhinitis.

Decongestants such as pseudoephedrine treat nasal stuffiness but are mild stimulants and even in oral formulations may produce rebound congestion and headaches. These drugs are usually used in combination with antihistamines to control the full spectrum of allergic rhinitis symptoms. Antihistamines and decongestants alone generally do not provide satisfactory relief in patients with moderate to severe allergic rhinitis.

Intranasal corticosteroids, including triamcinolone acetonide (two sprays [55 µg] to each side of the nose every day), mometasone furoate (two sprays [50 µg] to each naris every day), fluticasone propionate (two sprays [50 µg] to each naris every day), and budesonide (two sprays [32 µg] to each naris every day) (Table 398-6), are the treatments of choice for patients with moderate to severe seasonal allergic rhinitis or perennial allergic rhinitis.A1 Intranasal corticosteroids provide a 50 to 90% reduction in symptoms compared with 20 to 30% for oral antihistamines.

Leukotriene modifiers (zileuton [1200 mg twice daily], zafirlukast [20 mg twice daily], montelukast [10 mg once daily]) have a confirmed efficacy in allergic rhinitis that is comparable to that of antihistamines but do significantly improve sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, ocular symptoms, and quality of life in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and perennial allergic rhinitis.

Nasalcromolyn stabilizes mast cells and mediates additional anti-inflammatory activities. Although it is not as effective as intranasal corticosteroids, cromolyn provides relief in patients with mild to moderate symptoms. The value of cromolyn is mitigated by the need for frequent doses (four times/day), a lack of efficacy in approximately 30 to 40% of recipients, and the superior efficacy of intranasal corticosteroids in controlled studies. Cromolyn may be especially useful preventively (e.g., immediately before cat exposure). Ocular cromolyn has been especially useful in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. No significant side effects are associated with its use.

Infectious Rhinitis and Sinusitis

Viral rhinitis is treated with supportive care, including fluid replacement and treatment of the febrile component of the syndrome with acetaminophen ornonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications. Steam has a mild decongestant effect, and vitamin C and good nutrition may help hasten the resolution of symptoms. Oral decongestants (e.g., pseudoephedrine, 120 mg every 12 hours for several days), mucolytics (e.g., guaifenesin, 200 to 400 mg every 4 to 6 hours for several days), and ipratropium bromide (0.03 or 0.06%, two sprays on each side of the nose every 12 hours for several days) are of potential benefit.

Acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis confirmed by a CT scan usually requires surgical decompression, as do some cases of refractory sinusitis in immunocompromised patients or patients in the intensive care unit, where direct culture can guide antibiotic therapy. For clinically diagnosed acute purulent rhinitis or acute rhinosinusitis of less than 10 days’ duration, antibiotics are of little benefit because a diagnosis of bacterial rhinosinusitis based on the history and physical examination is quite inaccurate.A2 For example, a 10-day course of amoxicillin does not reduce symptoms at day 3 or 10 compared with placebo among patients with acute rhinosinusitis, and it only slightly improves symptoms at day 7.A3

Because the potential side effects of antibiotics are not trivial, they should be reserved for patients with a high probability of bacterial infection.4 The best clinical predictors of the presence ofacute bacterial rhinosinusitis rather than viral rhinosinusitis include persistent symptoms for 7 or more days without evidence of clinical improvement; high fever (>39° C or 102° F) with purulent nasal discharge or facial pain for at least 3 to 4 consecutive days; or the onset of worsening symptoms more than 5 days after the onset of an apparent viral upper respiratory tract infection. In patients who meet one or more of those three criteria, empirical antibiotic therapy is recommended,5 preferably with amoxicillin-clavulanate (875 mg/125 mg orally twice daily, increasing to 2000 mg/125 mg orally twice daily in patients with fever greater than 39° C or 102° F, immunocompromise, or recent antibiotic use). In patients who are allergic to penicillin, the best alternative is doxycycline (100 mg orally twice daily), with a fluoroquinolone (e.g., levofloxacin 500 mg orally daily or moxifloxacin 400 mg orally daily) reserved for patients who cannot tolerate it or do not respond because of their poorer side-effect profiles. By comparison, macrolides, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and second- and third-generation oral cephalosporins are not recommended because of high levels of resistance. The usual course of therapy is 5 to 7 days, regardless of the medication chosen. Intranasal saline irrigations, using either physiologic or hypertonic saline, may be a useful adjunct in patients with acute bacterial, rhinosinusitis, but neither topical decongestants nor antihistamines are useful. If patients worsen despite 72 hours of treatment or do not improve after 5 to 7 days, further evaluation should include CT to localize the infection and detect complications, and cultures—either by direct sinus aspiration or endoscopically guided cultures of the middle meatus; other cultures are unreliable.

Chronic Rhinosinusitis

The mainstay of treating the symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis are corticosteroids, either as atopical spray (e.g., triamcinolone acetonide, two 55-µg sprays to each side of the nose every day; mometasone furoate, two 50-µg sprays to each naris every day; fluticasone propionate, two 50-µg sprays to each naris every day; or budesonide, two 32-µg sprays to each naris every day) for 6 weeks or anoral tapering dose (prednisone 40 mg per day for 5 days, followed by 30 mg per day for 5 days, followed by 20 mg per day for 5 days, followed by 10 mg per day for 5 days; or methylprednisolone 4 mg tablets beginning with 24 mg the first day and tapering by 4 mg each subsequent day for 6 days).A4 Hypertonic saline irrigation may be of some help,A5 but courses of oral antibiotics are of little value.A6 Endoscopically obtained cultures of the middle meatus can help define which patients may improve with culture-guided antibiotic treatment. Antifungal agents, including itraconazole in an oral or aerosolized form and amphotericin B in an aerosolized form, do not appear beneficial in the treatment of typical chronic sinusitis.

Surgical Therapy

Patients who have severe symptoms, who fail to respond to therapy, or who have unusual, or resistant, or recurrent infections should be sent to a specialist for further evaluation and treatment (Table 398-7). Surgery is recommended in patients with benign neoplasms, mucoceles, juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma, and some types of malignancies. Surgery can correct septal deviations and anatomically related nasal obstruction.A6b Surgery on the inferior turbinates may be beneficial for refractory rhinitis. Functional endoscopic surgery, which is designed to preserve mucociliary function and is performed with endoscopes through the nostril without skin incisions, can be useful for recurrent acute sinusitis and chronic rhinosinusitis.

Management of Acute Sinusitis and Its Complications

STEVEN E. SOBOL MD, in Pediatric Otolaryngology, 2007

SUMMARY

Acute sinusitis complicates 1% to 5% of all upper respiratory tract infections in children. The usual pathogens are Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. The clinical presentation is similar to that of a viral URI, and making the diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion. Management should always include 10 to 14 days of antimicrobial therapy directed toward the most common pathogens and should incorporate vasoconstrictor sprays to enhance sinus drainage. The potential for serious complications of acute sinusitis in children is real and underscores the need to be vigilant in management of these patients.

MAJOR POINTS

Acute sinusitis may be defined as a bacterial or viral infection of the sinuses of less than 4 weeks' duration. It may complicate 5% to 10% of all upper respiratory tract infections in children.

Differentiation from viral URI on clinical presentation is often difficult. Prolonged URI symptoms (longer than 7 to 10 days), purulent nasal discharge, and/or significant facial or dental pain strongly suggests the diagnosis of acute sinusitis.

Diagnostic imaging is usually not indicated to establish the diagnosis of acute sinusitis and should be reserved for evaluation of the intensive care patient, when complications are suspected, or in the preoperative evaluation of surgical candidates.

Cultures are not routinely obtained in the evaluation of acute sinusitis but should be assayed in the intensive care or immunocompromised patient, children not responding to appropriate medical management, or patients with complications of sinusitis.

The goals of management are to reestablish sinus drainage to treat the usual pathogens—Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. Intensive care patients with acute sinusitis require adequate intravenous antibiotic coverage for gram-negative organisms.

Management should initially include systemic antibiotic therapy and topical decongestion of the sinuses. Surgical drainage of the affected sinus is indicated when medical management fails, in selected immunocompromised patients, and in patients in whom complications are present.

Orbital complications are the most common complication in children and must be treated aggressively to prevent possible intracranial spread and loss of vision.

Intracranial complications of sinusitis are rare and require urgent management by the otolaryngologist and neurosurgeon when diagnosed.

Read full chapter

URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780323048552500137

Acute Rhinosinusitis : Pathogenesis, Treatment, and Complications

Paul W. Flint MD, FACS, in Cummings Otolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery, 2021

Definitions of Acute and Chronic Rhinosinusitis

In order to understand the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of rhinosinusitis, it is important to realize that different types of rhinosinusitis have been defined, and the inciting mechanism may vary dramatically among the different subtypes. Althoughsinusitis is the term commonly used for any inflammation or infection of sinuses, this term has largely been replaced byrhinosinusitis, because the nose is almost always involved with the infection or inflammation at the same time as the sinuses.1 Because many potential factors can contribute to rhinosinusitis, some debate has ensued concerning the exact definition. In general terms,rhinosinusitis is defined as “a group of disorders characterized by inflammation of the mucosa of the paranasal sinuses.”2 In 1997, the Rhinosinusitis Task Force of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery3 developed a now well-accepted classification of rhinosinusitis, and this was reported by Lanza and Kennedy.1 This classification relies on the identification of symptoms to make a diagnosis. The symptoms are broken into major symptoms—purulent nasal drainage, nasal congestion, facial pressure or pain, decreased smell, and posterior purulent drainage—and various minor symptoms.1 When a patient describes two major criteria or one major and two minor criteria, rhinosinusitis can be diagnosed (Table 40.1). The classification of rhinosinusitis types was based primarily on time frames from the onset of symptoms. More recently, a stricter division for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) has been described based on endoscopic findings. These include CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and without nasal polyps (CRSsNP). The 2012 European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps (EPOS 2012)4 further defines the disease process for both the adult and pediatric populations (Box 40.1).

An inflammatory response is an expected sequela of an infectious process. Sinonasal inflammation can result from a variety of elements that result in sinus ostia obstruction and predisposes patients to infection. Many factors have been described that play a role in the development of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (ABRS).1,4–6 These include factors related to the host: genetic factors such as immotile cilia syndrome or cystic fibrosis; certain systemic diseases or medical treatments that predispose individuals to infections; neoplasms; and allergic or immune disorders. Although anatomic abnormalities such as large septal spurs and large paradoxic turbinates have been suggested to be associated with rhinosinusitis, it is not currently clear whether a relation exists. Rhinosinusitis may also develop in relationship to environmental factors that include bacterial, viral, or fungal infections or inflammation that occurs secondary to fungal or bacterial colonization2,7; trauma; primary or secondary tobacco smoke exposure;8 chronic or acute irritants or noxious chemicals; or iatrogenic factors such as surgery, medications, nasal packing, or nasogastric tube placement.9 Evidence shows that individuals with allergic rhinitis have a higher incidence of developing both acute and CRS, and an association of ABRS with asthma has also been suggested, although this may also relate to the presence of allergic rhinitis.6–8

Traumatic and Nontraumatic Emergencies of the Brain, Head, and Neck

Glenn D. Barest, ... Osamu Sakai, in Emergency Radiology, 2009

Sinus and Orbital Infections

Uncomplicated acute sinusitis is typically clinically diagnosed and managed. On imaging, findings of acute sinusitis are not very specific. An air–fluid level within a sinus can suggest acute sinusitis; however, lack of this finding does not mean a patient does not have acute sinusitis. Occasionally, hyperdense opacification in the paranasal sinuses can be seen; the hyperdensity can reflect hemorrhage related to trauma, trapped proteinaceous debris, or fungal infection. Fungal infection is an important diagnostic consideration, since steroids probably should be incorporated into the treatment regimen if the cause is related to allergic disease (Fig. 1-65).

When more advanced sinus disease is of concern, imaging plays a more definitive role. Complicated sinus disease should be clinically suspected if the patient presents with visual changes, altered mental status, or seizures. Initial imaging for workup of complicated sinusitis can begin with CT. At our institution, axial images through the facial bones are routinely acquired at 1.25-mm intervals with coronal and sagittal reformats using bone and soft tissue algorithms. If there is concern for intracranial or orbital extension of infection, contrast-enhanced CT using similar imaging parameters can provide additional critical information. If there is clinical concern for intracranial extension, the entire brain should be imaged. Since complicated sinus infection usually warrants close follow-up imaging, MR is the preferred imaging modality to minimize radiation exposure, especially in the pediatric setting. Typical brain MR protocol includes sagittal T1, axial FLAIR, fat-suppressed T2, gradient echo, and diffusion-weighted images, followed by multiplanar postcontrast T1 images of the brain. If orbital extension is of clinical concern, high spatial resolution T2 images with and without fat suppression through the orbits, and axial and coronal pre- and postcontrast T1-weighted images, can provide excellent diagnostic detail.

CT is particularly useful in establishing the integrity of paranasal sinus walls and can effectively demonstrate areas of bony dehiscence. Intracranial or orbital spread of infection can occur directly through areas of bony dehiscence or indirectly by perivascular extension, most commonly secondary to frontal or ethmoid sinus disease. Perivascular spread more commonly occurs in the pediatric setting. Intracranial extension is usually seen in the setting of frontal sinus infection, with involvement of the anterior cranial fossa and frontal lobes (Fig. 1-66). Imaging can demonstrate associated dural enhancement, epidural or subdural collections, and meningoencephalitis with abscess formation. There may be concomitant swelling of the soft tissues of the forehead, known as Pott’s puffy tumor (Fig.1-67). This does not imply neoplastic involvement, but rather describes osteomyelitis with extracranial soft tissue abscess formation. The presence of pachymeningeal enhancement does not necessarily imply that brain parenchyma is involved, and may only reflect dural reaction. Epidural and subdural collections can be demonstrated on either CT or MR as extra-axial fluid, possibly compressing the subjacent brain parenchyma. Subdural collections can cross sutures and generally maintain a crescentic shape, whereas epidural collections are restricted by sutures and may have a lentiform (biconvex) shape. While a reactive subdural effusion may be associated with smooth pachymeningeal enhancement, an infected subdural or epidural collection can demonstrate restricted diffusion and thickened, more irregular dural enhancement on MR. Leptomeningeal involvement is demonstrated as curvilinear enhancement extending into sulci. This may be accompanied by FLAIR hyperintensity in a corresponding distribution, which is a sensitive but nonspecific finding. Parenchymal involvement can be demonstrated by FLAIR hyperintensity and enhancement. Frank abscess formation can be demonstrated by CT or MR as a peripherally enhancing fluid collection. Restricted diffusion in the collection can support this impression.

While posterior ethmoid disease can also lead to intracranial involvement, more commonly, untreated ethmoid sinusitis can extend into the medial aspect of the orbit (Fig. 1-68). Infection can spread in a subperiosteal fashion along the medial wall of the orbit, appearing as an elliptical shaped phlegmon or fluid collection. This may cause displacement of extraocular muscles. Without treatment, the phlegmon or abscess can then break through the periosteum and extend directly into the orbit and into the extraocular muscles. Depending on the size of the inflammatory process, there can be displacement of extraocular muscles and the globe, along with distortion, stretching, and compression of the optic nerve. Such findings constitute an ophthalmologic emergency, as prolonged mass effect on the optic nerve can result in permanent blindness.

Other possible critical complications of orbital infection include extension of infection and involvement of contents of the orbital apex (cranial nerve II), superior orbital fissure (cranial nerves III, IV, V1, VI, and superior orbital vein), and inferior orbital fissure (V2, infraorbital nerve). Idiopathic inflammation involving the cavernous sinus, known as Tolosa-Hunt syndrome, can manifest clinically as palsies of the cranial nerves that traverse the cavernous sinus, namely, III, IV, V1, V2, and VI.

Venous sinus thrombosis can result from ethmoid or sphenoid sinus or orbital infection, and careful attention to the cavernous sinuses on postcontrast images is necessary. Facial soft tissue, dental, and ear infections are other possible causes. Direct signs of septic cavernous sinus thrombosis, also termed cavernous sinus thrombophlebitis (CST), include an enlarged sinus with a convex border, and a single large or multiple irregular filling defect(s). Normal neural structures and intracavernous fat deposits should not be mistaken as true filling defects. Indirect signs include dilation of the superior ophthalmic vein, exophthalmos, soft tissue edema, thrombi in the superior ophthalmic vein, superior and inferior petrosal, or sigmoid sinuses, and decrease in caliber of the internal carotid artery. Thin-section, contrast-enhanced CT with coronal reformats may be equivalent to MR for the detection of these findings. However, once venous sinus thrombosis is suspected, MR imaging of the brain may confirm the diagnosis and evaluate for possible complications of meningitis, subdural empyema, cerebritis, and even pituitary necrosis. Postcontrast T1 coronal and axial images are generally sufficient to make the diagnosis. Contrast-enhanced MR venography may also offer support in diagnosis. (Phase contrast MR venography is generally limited for this evaluation. Contrast-enhanced CT [CT venography] and MR with thin slices are generally more helpful to diagnose CST.) Prior to the antibiotic era, CST was almost always fatal. In the modern era, mortality in the range of to 30% may still be expected. In addition to antibiotics, early institution of anticoagulant therapy may reduce mortality. Morbidity may result from cranial nerve dysfunction including blindness, pituitary insufficiency, and hemiparesis.

Read full chapter

URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780323054072000014

Facial Pain in Children

Jeffry Shaefer, in Pediatric Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2004

Sinusitis

Children with acute sinusitis often have headache, nasal drainage, facial pain, and congestion, whereas those with chronic sinusitis have more subtle signs.20 Infection, allergic reactions, anatomic obstruction, and underlying disease are among the causes that must be differentiated.21 Acute sinusitis frequently follows upper respiratory tract infections. Children with chronic sinusitis can complain of nasal obstruction, postnasal drip, and intermittent facial pain, with symptoms persisting for 3 months or more.22 Predisposition to the condition may be caused by rhinitis (allergic or nonallergic) or aberrant anatomy resulting in poor drainage and chronic infection of the sinuses. Quite often sinus disease can cause pain referred to other areas, confusing the diagnosis (Figure 18-2).18 Palpation and percussion over the affected sinus can help localize the source of pain. Generally, plain radiographic views and sinus transillumination are of little value in young children. Computed tomography is much more sensitive, but the relevance of its findings for treatment decisions in children is controversial.23

Read full chapter

URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780721696911500235

Clinical Syndromes and Cardinal Features of Infectious Diseases: Approach to Diagnosis and Initial Management

Ellen R. Wald, in Principles and Practice of Pediatric Infectious Disease (Third Edition), 2008

SURGICAL MANAGEMENT

Patients with acute sinusitis rarely require surgical intervention in the absence of orbital or central nervous system complications. An appreciation for the fact that a large group of pediatric patients with chronic sinusitis have underlying allergic rhinitis or other medical problems such as gastroesophageal reflux has led to more aggressive medical management and less enthusiasm for surgical solutions.29 Occasionally, sinus aspiration is required to ventilate a sinus in a patient with no response to aggressive antimicrobial therapy.

In the rare child who has failed conventional treatment with oral antibiotics and an array of local and systemic adjuvants to therapy, antibiotic therapy delivered via a percutaneous intravenous catheter may be a worthwhile trial.30 This can be combined with adenoidectomy, or adenoidectomy may be undertaken either as a solo intervention or performed in conjunction with functional endoscopic surgery.31,32

When functional endoscopic sinus surgery is performed, the focus is on the ostiomeatal complex, highlighted in Figure 34-3. This is the area between the middle and inferior turbinates that represents the confluence of drainage areas of the frontal, ethmoid, and maxillary sinuses. In the ostiomeatal complex, there are several areas where two mucosal layers come into contact, predisposing to local impairment of mucociliary clearance. Using an endoscope, the natural meatus of the maxillary outflow tract is enlarged by excising the uncinate process and the ethmoid bullae and performing an anterior ethmoidectomy. Ramodan recently reported a group of 66 children undergoing either adenoidectomy or endoscopic surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis.31 The group undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery had the greatest improvement in overall symptom scores. As our understanding of the pathogenetic factors predisposing to sinusitis expands and our therapy of these mucosal diseases becomes more effective, the pediatric candidates for surgical management of their sinus disease will continue to decrease. Judicious use of endoscopic surgery in children younger than 5 years is strongly advised.33

Read full chapter

URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780702034688500407

Non-neoplastic lesions of the nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses, and nasopharynx

Margaret Brandwein-Gensler, Walter C. Bell, in Head and Neck Pathology (Second Edition), 2013

Prognosis and therapy

The treatment of acute sinusitis should involve eradication of the causative bacteria and improvement of sinus drainage and aeration. Sinus puncture and irrigation allow for specimen collection for bacterial culture, and thus the initiation of directed antimicrobial therapy. It also relieves symptoms due to sinus pressure. Endoscopic sinus surgery can address anatomic causes of impaired drainage. Topical sprays and oral vasoconstrictors can be used to reduce edema and further aid sinus drainage. Amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin are the recommended first-line antimicrobials to cover S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and anaerobic bacteria.

Chronic sinusitis requires at least 3 to 4 weeks of antimicrobial therapy, ideally guided by culture results. Amoxicillin-clavulanate, second-generation cephalosporins, and erythromycin-sulfisoxazole are recommended first-line antibiotics. Other individualized supportive therapies include steroids, decongestants, nasal irrigations, mucolytic agents, antihistamines, and antiallergic immune therapies. Patients should be supported with smoking cessation programs. Patients who are refractory to medical therapy or have evidence of anatomic obstruction may undergo (endoscopic) sinus surgery.

Read full chapter

URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9781437726077000105

Opening Round

David M. Yousem MD, MBA, in Head and Neck Imaging (Fourth Edition), 2015

Comment

Imaging Findings

The imaging findings that imply acute sinusitis include new mucosal thickening, air-fluid levels (Figure S1-1), and air bubbles in sinus secretions (Figure S1-2) even in the absence of an air-fluid level. The misconception that mucosal edema/thickening occurs only in chronic sinusitis is rampant, but this author, who underwent serial imaging of himself during the course of 14 days of antibiotics and intranasal steroid therapy, demonstrated that mucosal thickening appears and resolves over that period of time along with symptoms.

Sites of Obstruction

When reviewing cases of chronic and acute sinusitis, clinicians should note the potential obstructive sites that may be the underlying cause of the sinusitis. Radiologists should report on areas of mucosal thickening and narrowings of the maxillary sinus ostia, hiatus semilunaris, infundibulum, and middle meatus in cases of maxillary and ethmoid sinusitis. For frontal sinusitis, the frontal (ethmoidal) recess and middle meatus should be scrutinized. For posterior ethmoid and sphenoid sinusitis, the spheno-ethmoidal recess should be assessed for obstruction.

Pathogens

Viral and bacterial microorganisms are the usual culprits in an immunocompetent individual with acute sinusitis. Rhinoviruses, influenza virus, parainfluenza virus, and respiratory syncytial virus are the leading viral pathogens. Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Staphylococcus aureus constitute the usual bacteria.

Read full chapter

URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9781455776290000017

How do you test for maxillary and frontal sinuses?

Palpation.
Use a circular motion to palpate..
Begin with the frontal sinuses inferior to the eye brows over the bony ridge. Avoid the eye socket..
Then, palpate the maxillary sinuses inferior to the zygomatic bone slightly lateral to the nose..
Inquire if the client had any pain/tenderness upon palpation..

How do you test for maxillary sinusitis?

Shine the light downward from just below the inner aspect of each eye. Look through the open mouth at the hard palate. A reddish glow indicates a normal air-filled maxillary sinus. Absence of glow suggests thickened mucosa or secretions in the maxillary sinus.

What tests are used to diagnose sinusitis?

Advertisement.
Nasal endoscopy. A thin, flexible tube (endoscope) with a fiber-optic light inserted through your nose allows your doctor to visually inspect the inside of your sinuses..
Imaging studies. A CT scan shows details of your sinuses and nasal area. ... .
Nasal and sinus samples. ... .
Allergy testing..

How is frontal sinusitis diagnosed?

Diagnosing acute frontal sinusitis.
nasal endoscopy to look inside your sinus and nasal cavities..
imaging tests with a CT scan or MRI..
allergy tests..
blood tests for other possible causes of sinusitis..