Alcalde, J., Bond, C. E., and Randle, C. H.: Framing bias: The effect of figure presentation on seismic interpretation, Interpretation, 5, 591–605, //doi.org/10.1190/INT-2017-0083.1, 2017a. a
Alcalde, J., Bond, C. E., Johnson, G., Butler, R. W. H., Cooper, M. A., and Ellis, J. F.: The importance of structural model availability on seismic interpretation, J. Struct. Geol., 97, 161–171, //doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2017.03.003, 2017b. a, b, c, d
Andrews, B. J., Roberts, J. J., Shipton, Z. K., Bigi, S., Tartarello, M. C., and Johnson, G.: How do we see fractures? Quantifying subjective bias in fracture data collection, Solid Earth, 10, 487–516, //doi.org/10.5194/se-10-487-2019, 2019. a
Araya-Polo, M., Dahlke, T., Frogner, C., Zhang, C., Poggio, T., and Hohl, D.: Automated fault detection without seismic processing, The Leading Edge, 36, 208–214, //doi.org/10.1190/tle36030208.1, 2017. a
Argent, R. M.: An overview of model integration for environmental applications – components, frameworks and semantics, Environ. Modell. Softw., 19, 219–234, //doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00150-6, 2004. a, b
Argent, R. M. and Houghton, B.: Land and water resources model integration: Software engineering and beyond, Adv. Environ. Res., 5, 351–359, //doi.org/10.1016/S1093-0191(01)00086-7, 2001. a, b
Baddeley, M. C., Curtis, A., and Wood, R.: An introduction to prior information derived from probabilistic judgements: Elicitation of knowledge, cognitive bias and herding, in: Geological Prior Information: Informing Science and Engineering, edited by: Curtis, A. and Wood, R., The Geological Society of London, London, UK, 15–27, //doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.239.01.02, 2004. a
Baddeley, M.: Herding, social influences and behavioural bias in scientific research: Simple awareness of the hidden pressures and beliefs that influence our thinking can help to preserve objectivity, EMBO Rep., 16, 902–905, //doi.org/10.15252/embr.201540637, 2015. a
Barclay, E. J., Renshaw, C. E., Taylor, H. A., and Bilge, A. R.: Improving decision making skill using an online volcanic crisis simulation: Impact of data presentation format, Journal of Geoscience Education, 59, 85–92, //doi.org/10.5408/1.3543933, 2011. a, b, c, d
Bárdossy, G. and Fodor, J.: Traditional and new ways to handle uncertainty in geology, Natural Resources Research, 10, 179–187, //doi.org/10.1023/A:1012513107364, 2001. a
Beaulac, G. and Kenyon, T.: Critical thinking education and debiasing, Informal Log., 34, 341–363, //doi.org/10.22329/il.v34i4.4203, 2014.
Böckenholt, U.: The cognitive-miser response model: Testing for intuitive and deliberate reasoning, Psychometrika, 77, 388–399, //doi.org/10.1007/s11336-012-9251-y, 2012. a
Bond, C. E.: Uncertainty in structural interpretation: Lessons to be learnt, J. Struct. Geol., 74, 185–200, //doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2015.03.003, 2015. a, b
Bond, C. E., Gibbs, A. D., Shipton, Z. K., and Jones, S.: What do you think this is? “Conceptual uncertainty” in geoscience interpretation, Geological Society of America Today, 17, 4–10, //doi.org/10.1130/GSAT01711A.1, 2007. a, b, c, d
Bond, C. E., Shipton, Z. K., Gibbs, A. D., and Jones, S.: Structural models: Optimizing risk analysis by understanding conceptual uncertainty, First Break, 26, 65–71, //doi.org/10.3997/1365-2397.2008006, 2008. a
Bovens, L.: The ethics of nudge, in: Preference change, edited by: Hansson, M. J. and Grüne-Yanoff, T., Springer, Berlin, Germany, 207–219, //doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2593-7_10, 2009. a
Camerer, C. F. and Hogarth, R. M.: The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework, J. Risk Uncertainty, 19, 7–42, //doi.org/10.1023/A:1007850605129, 1999. a
Challen, R., Denny, J., Pitt, M., Gompels, L., Edwards, T., and Tsaneva-Atanasova, K.: Artificial intelligence, bias and clinical safety, BMJ Quality and Safety, 28, 231–237, //doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008370, 2019. a
Chamberlin, T. C.: The method of multiple working hypotheses, Science, 15, 92–96, //doi.org/10.1126/science.148.3671.754, 1890. a
Chen, C. and Zhao, B.: Review of relationship between indoor and outdoor particles: I∕O ratio, infiltration factor and penetration factor, Atmos. Environ., 45, 275–288, //doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.048, 2011. a
Cooke, N. M. and McDonald, J. E.: A formal methodology for acquiring and representing expert knowledge, P. IEEE, 74, 1422–1430, //doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1986.13643, 1986. a
Czaika, E. and Selin, N. E.: Model use in sustainability policy making: An experimental study, Environ. Modell. Softw., 98, 54–62, //doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.09.001, 2017. a
Dawes, R. M. and Corrigan, B.: Linear models in decision making, Psychol. Bull., 81, 95–106, //doi.org/10.1037/h0037613, 1974. a
Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., and Meehl, P. E.: Clinical versus actuarial Judgment, Science, 24, 1668–1674, //doi.org/10.1126/science.2648573, 1989. a
de Graaf, M. M. and Malle, B. F.: How people explain action (and autonomous intelligent systems should too), in: AAAI Fall Symposium Series, Artificial Intelligence for Human-Robot Interaction, 9–11 November 2017, Arlington, Virgina, 19–26, 2017. a
Di, H.: Developing a seismic pattern interpretation network (SpiNet) for automated seismic interpretation, arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.08517, 2018. a
Downs, J. S., Loewenstein, G., and Wisdom, J.: Eating by the numbers, New York Times, A31, available at: //www.nytimes.com/2009/11/13/opinion/13lowenstein.html (last access: 28 August 2019), 2009. a
Edwards, D., Morris, J., and Tabbush, P.: Stakeholder participation in the development and use of sustainability impact assessment tools for European land use policies, in: EASY-ECO Conference, Sustainable Development Evaluations in Europe, Brussels, Belgium, 17–19 November, 2010. a
Elliot, L. P. and Brook, B. W.: Revisiting Chamberlin: Multiple working hypotheses for the 21st century, BioScience, 57, 608–614, //doi.org/10.1641/B570708, 2007. a
Englich, B., Mussweiler, T., and Strack, F.: Playing dice with criminal sentences: The influence of irrelevant anchors on experts judicial decision making, Pers. Soc. Psychol. B., 32, 188–200, //doi.org/10.1177/0146167205282152, 2006. a
Epley, N. and Gilovich, T.: The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic: Why the adjustments are insufficient, Psychol. Sci., 17, 311–318, //doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01704.x, 2006. a, b
Evans, J. S. B. T. and Stanovich, K. E.: Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate, Perspect. Psychol. Sci., 8, 223–241, //doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685, 2013. a, b, c
Fagley, N. S. and Miller, P. M.: Framing effects and arenas of choice: Your money or your life?, Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec., 71, 355–373, //doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1997.2725, 1997. a
Farrokhnia, F., Kahoo, A. R., and Soleimani, M.: Automatic salt dome detection in seismic data by combination of attribute analysis on CRS images and IGU map delineation, J. Appl. Geophys., 159, 395–407, //doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.09.018, 2018. a
Fogg, B. J.: Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA, 2003. a
Fischhoff, B.: Debiasing, in: Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, edited by: Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 422–444, 1982. a, b
Fong, G. T., Krantz, D. H., and Nisbett, R. E.: The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems, Cognitive Psychol., 18, 253–292, //doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(86)90001-0, 1986.
Frederick, S.: Cognitive reflection and decision making, J. Econ. Perspect., 19, 25–42, //doi.org/10.1257/089533005775196732, 2005. a
Freeman, B., Boult, P. J., Yielding, G., and Menpes, S.: Using empirical geological rules to reduce structural uncertainty in seismic interpretation of faults, J. Struct. Geol., 32, 1668–1676, //doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2009.11.001, 2010. a
Frodeman, R.: Geological reasoning: Geology as an interpretive and historical science, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 107, 960–968, //doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1995)107<0960:GRGAAI>2.3.CO;2, 1995. a
Garcia-Retamero, R. and Dhami, M. K.: On avoiding framing effects in experienced decision makers, Q. J. Exp. Psychol., 66, 829–842, //doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.727836, 2013. a
Gigerenzer, G.: On the supposed evidence for libertarian paternalism, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6, 361–383, //doi.org/10.1007/s13164-015-0248-1, 2015. a
Gil, Y., David, C. H., Demir, I., Essawy, B. T., Fulweiler, R. W., Goodall, J. L., Karlstrom, L., Lee, H., Mills, H. J., Oh, J., Pierce, S. A., Pope, A., Tzeng, M. W., Villamizar, S. R., and Yu, Z.: Toward the geoscience paper of the future: best practices for documenting and sharing research from data to software to provenance, Earth Space Sci., 3, 388–415, //doi.org/10.1002/2015EA000136, 2016. a
Gil, Y., Pierce, S. A., Babaie, H., Banerjee, A., Borne, K., Bust, G., Cheatham, M., Ebert-Uphoff, I., Gomes, C., Hill, M., Horel, J., Hsu, L., Kinter, J., Knoblock, C., Krum, D., Kumar, V., Lermusiaux, P., Liu, C., North, C., Pankratius, V., Peters, S., Plale, B., Pope, A., Ravela, S., Restrepo, J., Ridley, A., Samet, H., and Shekhar, S.: Intelligent systems for geosciences: an essential research agenda, Commun ACM, 62, 76–84, //doi.org/10.1145/3192335, 2018. a
Gilbert, G. K.: The inculcation of scientific method by example, with an illustration drawn from the Quaternary geology of Utah, Am. J. Sci., 31, 284–299, //doi.org/10.2475/ajs.s3-31.184.284, 1886. a
Gilovich, T., Griffin, D. W., and Kahneman, D. (Eds.): Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2002. a
Hemming, V., Walshe, T. V., Hanea, A. M., Fidler, F., and Burgman, M. A.: Eliciting improved quantitative judgements using the IDEA protocol: A case study in natural resource management, PloS One, 13, e0198468, //doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198468, 2018. a
Henderson, C., Mestre, J. P., and Slakey, L. L.: Cognitive Science Research Can Improve Undergraduate STEM Instruction: What Are the Barriers?, Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2, 51–60, //doi.org/10.1177/2372732215601115, 2015.
Holden, M. H. and Ellner, S. P.: Human judgment vs. quantitative models for the management of ecological resources, Ecol. Appl., 26, 1553–1565, //doi.org/10.1890/15-1295, 2016. a
Johnson, E. J. and Goldstein, D.: Do defaults save lives?, Science, 302, 1338–1339, //doi.org/10.1126/science.1091721, 2003. a
Kahneman, D.: Thinking, Fast and Slow, Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, New York, 2011. a
Kahneman, D. and Frederick, S.: A model of heuristic judgment, in: The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, edited by: Holyoak, K. J. and Morrison, R. G., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 267–293, 2002. a
Kahneman, D. and Frederick, S.: Frames and brains: Elicitation and control of response tendencies, Trends Cogn. Sci., 11, 45–46, //doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.007, 2007. a
Karpatne, A., Ebert-Uphoff, I., Ravela, S., Babaie, H. A., and Kumar, V.: Machine learning for the geosciences: Challenges and opportunities, IEEE T. Knowl Data En., 31, 1544–1554, //doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2018.2861006, 2018. a
Kempler, L. and Gross, S.: Teaching Quantitative Thinking in Geoscience with MATLAB, Geophys. Res. Abstr., EGU2018-19379, EGU General Assembly 2018, Vienna, Austria, 2018.
Koparan, C., Koc, A., Privette, C., and Sawyer, C.: In situ water quality measurements using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) system, Water, 10, 264–278, //doi.org/10.3390/w10030264, 2018. a
Koriat, A., Lichtenstein, S., and Fischhoff, B.: Reasons for confidence, J. Exp. Psychol.-Hum. L., 6, 107, //doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.107, 1980. a
Larrick, R. P.: Debiasing, in: Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making, edited by: Koehler, D. J. and Harvey, N., Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Hoboken, NJ, 316–337, 2004. a, b, c
Larrick, R. P., Morgan, J., and Nisbett, R. E.: Teaching the use of cost-benefit reasoning in everyday life, Psychol. Sci., 1, 362–370, //doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00243.x, 1990.
Larrick, R. P., Nisbett, R. E., and Morgan, J.: Who uses the normative rules of choice, in: Rules for Reasoning, edited by: Nisbett, R. E., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, 277–294, 1993.
Lerner, J. S. and Tetlock, P.: Accounting for the effects of accountability, Psychol. Bull., 125, 255–275, //doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.255, 1999. a
Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., and Gaeth, G. J.: All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects, Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec., 76, 149–188, //doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2804, 1998. a
Lindberg, D. C.: Galileo, the church, and the cosmos, in: When Science and Christianity Meet, edited by: Lindberg, D. C. and Numbers, R. L., University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 33–60, 2003. a
Lorenz, J., Rauhut, H., Schweitzer, F., and Helbing, D.: How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 9020–9025, //doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1008636108, 2011. a
Ly, K., Mažar, N., Zhao, M., and Soman, D.: A practitioner's guide to nudging, Rotman School of Management Working Paper, 2609347, //doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2609347, 2013. a
Madrian, B. C. and Shea, D. F.: The power of suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior, Q. J. Econ., 116, 1149–1187, //doi.org/10.3386/w7682, 2001. a
Manduca, C. A., Baer, E., Hancock, G., Macdonald, R. H., Patterson, S., Savina, M., and Wenner, J.: Making undergraduate geoscience quantitative, EOS T. Am. Geophys. Un., 89, 149–150, //doi.org/10.1029/2008EO160001, 2008.
Macrae, E. J., Bond, C. E., Shipton, Z. K., and Lunn, R. J.: Increasing the quality of seismic interpretation, Interpretation, 4, T395–T402, //doi.org/10.1190/INT-2015-0218.1, 2016. a, b, c, d, e, f, g
McIntosh, B., Voinov, A., and Giupponi, C.: Bridging the gaps between design and use: developing appropriate tools for environmental management and policy, in: Environmental Modelling, Software and Decision Support, edited by: Jakeman, A. J., Voinov, A. A., Rizzoli, A. E., and Chen, S. H., Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 33–48, 2008. a
McIntosh, B. S., Jeffrey, P., Lemon, M., and Winder, N.: On the design of computer-based models for integrated environmental science, Environ. Manage., 35, 741–752, //doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0172-0, 2005. a
McNeil, B. J., Pauker, S. G., Sox, H. C., and Tversky, A.: On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies, New Engl. J. Med., 306, 1259–1262, //doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198205273062103, 1982. a
Milkman, K. L., Chugh, D., and Bazerman, M. H.: How can decision making be improved?, Perspect. Psychol. Sci., 4, 379–383, //doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01142.x, 2009. a, b
Miller, T.: Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences, Artif. Intell., 267, 1–38, //doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2018.07.007, 2019. a
Mirsch, T., Lehrer, C., and Jung, R.: Digital nudging: altering user behavior in digital environments, in: Proceedings der 13. Internationalen Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik, St. Gallen, Switzerland, 12–15 February 2017, 634–648, 2017. a
Mussweiler, T., Strack, F., and Pfeiffer, T.: Overcoming the inevitable anchoring effect: Considering the opposite compensates for selective accessibility, Pers. Soc. Psychol. B, 26, 1142–1150, //doi.org/10.1177/01461672002611010, 2000. a
Ore, J. P., Elbaum, S., Burgin, A., and Detweiler, C.: Autonomous aerial water sampling, J. Field Robot., 32, 1095–1113, //doi.org/10.1002/rob.21591, 2015. a
Oxley, T., McIntosh, B. S., Winder, N., Mulligan, M., and Engelen, G.: Integrated modelling and decision-support tools: a Mediterranean example, Environ. Modell. Softw., 19, 999–1010, //doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2003.11.003, 2004. a
Phillips, L. D.: Group elicitation of probability distributions: Are many heads better than one?, in: Decision Science and Technology, edited by: Shanteau, J., Mellers, B. A., and Schum, D. A., Springer, Boston, Massachusetts, 313–330, 1999. a, b
Polson, D. and Curtis, A.: Dynamics of uncertainty in geological interpretation, J. Geol. Soc. London, 167, 5–10, //doi.org/10.1144/0016-76492009-055, 2010. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h
Qian, F., Jerolmack, D., Lancaster, N., Nikolich, G., Reverdy, P., Roberts, S., Shipley, T. F., Van Pelt, R. S., Zobeck, T. M., and Koditschek, D. E.: Ground Robotic Measurement of Aeolian Processes, Aeolian Res., 27, 1–11, //doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2017.04.004, 2017. a
Randle, C. H., Bond, C. E., Lark, R. M., and Monaghan, A. A.: Uncertainty in geological interpretations: Effectiveness of expert elicitations, Geosphere, 15, 108–118, //doi.org/10.1130/GES01586.1, 2019. a, b
Rankey, E. C. and Mitchell, J. C.: That's why it's called interpretation: Impact of horizon uncertainty on seismic attribute analysis, The Leading Edge, 22, 820–828, //doi.org/10.1190/1.1614152, 2003. a, b
Rizzo, M. J. and Whitman, D. G.: Little brother is watching you: New paternalism on the slippery slopes, Arizona Law Review, 51, 685–739, //doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1119325, 2009. a
Rizzoli, A. E. and Young, W. J.: Delivering environmental decision support systems: software tools and techniques, Environ. Modell. Softw., 12, 237–249, //doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(97)00016-9, 1997. a, b
Rowbotham, P., Kane, P., and Bentley, M.: Bias in geophysical interpretation: The case for multiple deterministic scenarios, The Leading Edge, 29, 590–595, //doi.org/10.1190/1.3422459, 2010. a, b
Sanna, L. J. and Schwarz, N.: Metacognitive experiences and human judgment: The case of hindsight bias and its debiasing, Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci., 15, 172–176, //doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00430.x, 2006. a
Shanteau, J., Weiss, D. J., Thomas, R. P., and Pounds, J. C.: Performance-based assessment of expertise: How to decide if someone is an expert or not, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 136, 253–263, //doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00113-8, 2002. a
Shipley, T. F. and Tikoff, B.: Collaboration, cyberinfrastructure, and cognitive science: The role of databases and dataguides in 21st century Structural Geology, J. Struct. Geol., 125, 48–54, //doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2018.05.007, 2018. a, b
Skeem, J. L. and Lowenkamp, C. T.: Risk, race, and recidivism: Predictive bias and disparate impact, Criminology, 54, 680–712, //doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2687339, 2016. a
Soll, J. B., Milkman, K. L., and Payne, J. W.: A user's guide to debiasing, in: Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making, 2nd Edn., edited by: Keren, G. and Wu, G., Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Hoboken, NJ, 506–951, 2016. a, b
Spino, R.: Big data and artificial intelligence analytics in geosciences: Promises and potential, Geological Society of America Today, 29, 42–43, //doi.org/10.1130/GSATG372GW.1, 2019. a
Stanovich, K. E.: The thinking that IQ tests miss, Scientific American Mind, 20, 34–39, 2009. a
Stanovich, K. E. and West, R. F.: Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?, Behav. Brain Sci., 23, 645–726, //doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808098.026, 2000. a
Taylor, H. A., Renshaw, C. E., and Jensen, M. D.: Effects of computer-based role-playing on decision making skills, J. Educ. Comput. Res., 17, 147–164, //doi.org/10.2190/Y1CX-XU4G-KDFK-JBFJ, 1997. a, b, c, d, e
Thaler, R. H. and Sunstein, C. R.: Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 2008. a, b
Thiele, S. T., Grose, L., Samsu, A., Micklethwaite, S., Vollgger, S. A., and Cruden, A. R.: Rapid, semi-automatic fracture and contact mapping for point clouds, images and geophysical data, Solid Earth, 8, 1241–1253, //doi.org/10.5194/se-8-1241-2017, 2017. a
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D.: The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice, Science, 211, 453–458, //doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683, 1981. a, b
Vasuki, Y., Holden, E. J., Kovesi, P., and Micklethwaite, S.: Semi-automatic mapping of geological Structures using UAV-based photogrammetric data: An image analysis approach, Comput. Geosci., 69, 22–32, //doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2014.04.012, 2014. a
Vasuki, Y., Holden, E. J., Kovesi, P., and Micklethwaite, S.: An interactive image segmentation method for lithological boundary detection: A rapid mapping tool for geologists, Comput. Geosci., 100, 27–40, //doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2016.12.001, 2017. a
Vine, F. J.: The continental drift debate, Nature, 266, 19–22, //doi.org/10.1038/266019a0, 1977. a
Watkins, H., Bond, C. E., Healy, D., and Butler, R. W.: Appraisal of fracture sampling methods and a new workflow to characterise heterogeneous fracture networks at outcrop, J. Struct. Geol., 72, 67–82, //doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2015.02.001, 2015. a
Weinmann, M., Schneider, C., and vom Brocke, J.: Digital nudging, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng., 58, 433–436, //doi.org/10.1007/s12599-016-0453-1, 2016. a
Whitworth, B.: Polite computing, Behav. Inform. Technol., 24, 353–363, //doi.org/10.1080/01449290512331333700, 2005. a
Wood, R. and Curtis, A.: Geological prior information and its applications to geoscientific problems, Geol. Soc. Spec Publ., 239, 1–14, //doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.239.01.01, 2004. a, b
Zhang, Y., Wang, G., Li, M., and Han, S.: Automated Classification Analysis of Geological Structures Based on Images Data and Deep Learning Model, Appl. Sci., 8, 2493, //doi.org/10.3390/app8122493, 2018. a