What were the critical differences between the English settlement in Virginia and Massachusetts?

Almost from the start, investors in the Virginia Company in England were unhappy with the accomplishments of their Jamestown colonists. They therefore sought a new charter, which the king granted in May 1609. They took immediate steps to put the company on a sounder financial footing by selling shares valued at 12 1/2, 25, and 50 pounds (English monetary unit, originally equivalent to one pound of silver). Investors were promised a dividend from whatever gold, land, or other valuable commodities the Company amassed after seven years.

Nội dung chính

  • Additional Navigation
  • How was the settlement of Virginia and Massachusetts different?
  • How was the settlement of Virginia Southern colony different from the settlement of Massachusetts New England )?
  • How was the settlement of New England different from the settlement of Virginia?
  • What were the primary differences between Jamestown Virginia and Massachusetts Bay Colony settlements?

History of Virginia
The Capital and the Bay

Meanwhile, the charter allowed the Company to make its own laws and regulations, subject only to their compatibility with English law. To avoid the disputes that had characterized Virginia in its first years, the Company gave full authority and nearly dictatorial powers to the colony's governor. These changes were nearly too little and too late, for Jamestown was just then experiencing its "starving time." The Company, however, was bent on persevering and sent a new batch of ships and colonists in 1611. Over the next five years, Sir Thomas Gates and then Sir Thomas Dale governed the colony with iron fists via the "Lawes Devine, Morall, and Martiall."

The harsh regimes of the Virginia governors were not especially attractive to potential colonists. What was more, the colonists who did go to Virginia often did not have the skills and knowledge to help the colony prosper. The colonists not only found little of value, they were remarkably unable even to feed themselves. As a result, huge numbers of colonists perished from disease (many of which they brought with them), unsanitary conditions, and malnutrition. Between 1614 and 1618 or so, potential colonists were much more attracted to the West Indies and Bermuda than they were Virginia.

By 1618, the Virginia Company was forced to change course again. The Company had not solved the problem of profitability, nor that of settlers' morale. Sir Edwin Sandys became Company Treasurer and embarked on a series of reforms. He believed that the manufacturing enterprises the Company had begun were failing due to want of manpower. He embarked on a policy of granting sub-patents to land, which encouraged groups and wealthier individuals to go to Virginia. He sought to reward investors and so distributed 100 acres of land to each adventurer. He also distributed 50 acres to each person who paid his or her own way and 50 acres more for each additional person they brought along. This was known as the Virginia headright system.

Finally, Sandys thought it essential to reform the colony's governing structure. He hit upon the idea of convening an assembly in the colony, whose representatives would be elected by inhabitants. The assembly would have full power to enact laws on all matters relating to the colony. Of course, these laws could be vetoed by either the governor or the Company in London.

It may be said that some things improved, while others did not. With the experiments of John Rolfe, the colony finally discovered a staple product--tobacco. The colonists wanted to plant tobacco because it was a cash crop, even though the King opposed the use of the weed. But the Company constantly discouraged the cultivation of tobacco because its production seduced the colonists away from planting corn. The colony also continued to face the problem of lack of laborers and inability to feed itself. The ultimate answer to the labor problem was ominously foreshadowed in a little-noticed event that Rolfe described to Sandys in 1619: the arrival of a Dutch man-of-war carrying a group of captive Africans, for by the end of the century, African slave labor would become the colony's economic and social foundation. Indian relations, which seemed quiet for a time, finally spelled the end to the Virginia Company. In 1622, Indians rose up and massacred a large number of Virginia colonists. This led to an inquiry into Company affairs and finally the revocation of its charter.

For additional documents related to this topic, the most pertinent to the evolution of early Virginia, the Records of the Virginia Company (in the Thomas Jefferson Papers). Captain John Smith's Generall Historie of Virginia and the four volumes edited by Peter Force in the mid-19th century are also essential resources. Both of these sources are full-text searchable via The Capital and the Bay.

Documents

  • Sir Thomas Gates Reports to the Virginia Company, 1610
  • The Transition from Lord De La Warr to Sir Thomas Dale, May 1611
  • The Virginia Company's Public Relations Campaign, 1612
  • For the Colony of Virginea Britannia: Lawes Devine, Morall, and Martiall, 1612
  • Sir Thomas Dale Encourages Individual Enterprise in Virginia, 1614
  • Governor Argall Finds Virginia "Decayed and Crooked," 1617
    • Governor Argall, Letter to the Virginia Company, March 10, 1617
    • John Rolf Letter to Sir Edwin Sandys, June 8, 1617
  • The Virginia Colonists Find a Staple Product: Tobacco, 1616-1618
  • Virginia's Labor Problem, 1617-1620
    • Samuel Argall and John Rolf, 1617
    • John Rolf, 1618
    • Sir George Yeardley to Sir Edwin Sandys, 1620
  • Implementing the Great Charter in Virginia, 1619
  • John Rolf Reports on Virginia to Sir Edwin Sandys, 1619
  • Treasuror, Councell, and Company for Virginia, A Broadside, 1620
  • A Declaration of the State of Virginia, June 22, 1620
  • A Declaration of the State of the Colony and Affaires in Virginia, 1622
  • The Miserable Condition of Virginia, 1623 (May or June)
  • John Smith Assesses the Virginia Colony, 1624

Part of

  • Primary Source Sets
  • Lesson Plans
  • Presentations

Additional Navigation

  • Teachers Home

    The Library of Congress offers classroom materials and professional development to help teachers effectively use primary sources from the Library's vast digital collections in their teaching.

  • Analysis Tool & Guide

    To help your students analyze these primary sources, get a graphic organizer and guides.

How was the settlement of Virginia and Massachusetts different?

Virginia was founded primarily for economic reasons while Massachusetts was settled by people seeking religious freedom and self-determination.

How was the settlement of Virginia Southern colony different from the settlement of Massachusetts New England )?

The Southern Colonies were established as economic ventures and were seeking natural resources to provide material wealth to the mother country and themselves. In contrast, the early New England colonists were primarily religious reformers and separatists.

How was the settlement of New England different from the settlement of Virginia?

1. How were New England settlements different from Virginia settlements? New England's strong religious values restricted settlement far from the center of town, while Virginia's pursuit of wealth pushed settlers to the coast, and away from others.

What were the primary differences between Jamestown Virginia and Massachusetts Bay Colony settlements?

Jamestown: Had fertile soil/ good fro plantation... grew tobacco. Mass Bay Colony: Colonists who lived near the coast would fish or build ships, colonists who lived inland would farm.

What were the critical differences between the English settlements in Virginia and Massachusetts quizlet?

Virginia was Anglican, while Massachusetts was Puritan. Virginia had a royal colony, while Massachusetts had a charter colony. In Virginia, everyone lived in one enclosed community, while in Massachusetts, everyone was spread out.

How was the settlement of Virginia Southern colony different from the settlement of Massachusetts New England )?

The Southern Colonies were established as economic ventures and were seeking natural resources to provide material wealth to the mother country and themselves. In contrast, the early New England colonists were primarily religious reformers and separatists.

How were New England settlements different from Virginia settlements?

How were New England settlements different from Virginia settlements? New England's strong religious values restricted settlement far from the center of town, while Virginia's pursuit of wealth pushed settlers to the coast, and away from others.

Toplist

Neuester Beitrag

Stichworte