SummaryLong analyzed as biopolitics, the regulation of population always entailed geopolitics as well, although tracing the connections and separations of these strands across time, and across political cultures, is not easy. To appreciate the many dimensions of population in world history, a new approach is needed; something like an integrated and global gendered political economy of population. Considered at a global level, the eighteenth and nineteenth-century expansion of Europe was both demographic and geographic. The politics of fertility decline as it played out in international and racial relations has received much historical analysis, and within many different national traditions. The fertility decline has been read as depopulation. Imperial German scholars and statesmen had been deeply interested in population density, overpopulation, before and during the First World War. European demographic history was the main focus for European and non-European economists, both the massive population growth of the nineteenth century and the localized fertility declines. Show ReferencesChen, Ta. The Population in Modern China. University of Chicago Press, 1946.Google Scholar Engels, Friedrich. The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State [1884]. New York: International Publishers, 1974.Google Scholar Engels, Friedrich. “Outline of a critique of political economy” [1844]. In Appleman, Philip, ed., An Essay on the Principle of Population. New York: Norton, 2004.Google Scholar Sanger, Margaret. “A birth strike to avert world famine.” Birth Control Review 4 (1920).Google Scholar Sauvy, Alfred. “Trois mondes, une planète.” L’Observateur, August 14, 1952.Google Scholar Ahluwalia, Sanjam. Reproductive Restraints: Birth Control in India, 1877–1947. Urbana and Chicago, il: University of Illinois Press, 2008.Google Scholar Arnold, David. “Official attitudes to population, birth control and reproductive health in India, 1921–1946.” In Hodges, Sarah, ed., Reproductive Health in India: History, Politics, Controversies. Hyderabad: Orient Longman, 2006, pp. 22–50.Google Scholar Bashford, Alison. Global Population: History, Geopolitics, and Life on Earth. New York: Columbia University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Bashford, Alison. “Malthus and colonial history.” Journal of Australian Studies 36:1 (2012), 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Bashford, Alison, and Levine, Philippa, eds. The Oxford Handbook of the History of Eugenics. Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Bradatan, Cristina, and Firebaugh, Glenn. “History, population policies, and fertility decline in Eastern Europe.” Journal of Family History 32:2 (2007), 179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Briggs, Laura. Reproducing Empire: Race, Sex, Science, and U.S. Imperialism in Puerto Rico. Berkeley, ca: University of California Press, 2002.Google Scholar Caldwell, John. “Malthus and the less developed world: the pivotal role of India.” Population and Development Review 24:4 (1998), 675–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Chandra, Shanta Kohli. The Family Planning Programme in India. Delhi: Mittal, 1987.Google Scholar Cohn, Bernard S. “The census, social structure and objectification in South Asia.” In An Anthropologist among the Historians and Other Essays. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1987, pp. 224–254.Google Scholar Connelly, Matthew. Fatal Misconception: The Struggle to Control World Population. Cambridge, ma: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2008.Google Scholar Dölling, Irene, Hahn, Daphne, and Scholz, Sylka. “Birth strike in the new federal states: is sterilization an act of resistance?” In Gal, Susan and Kligman, Gail, eds., Reproducing Gender: Politics, Publics, and Everyday Life after Socialism. Princeton University Press, 2000, pp. 118–147.Google Scholar Dowbiggin, Ian. The Sterilization Movement and Global Fertility in the Twentieth Century. Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar Dunstan, Helen. “Official thinking on environmental issues and the state’s environmental roles in eighteenth-century China.” In Elvin, Mark and Liu, Ts’ui-jung, eds., Sediments of Time: Environment and Society in Chinese History. Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 585–616.Google Scholar Ehrlich, Paul R., and Liu, Jianguo. “Some roots of terrorism.” Population and Environment 2 (2012), 183–192.Google Scholar Feng, Wang, Cai, Yong, and Gu, Baochang. “Population, policy, and politics: how will history judge China’s one-child policy?” Population and Development Review 38 (2012), 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Fenn, Elizabeth. Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775–82. New York: Hill & Wang, 2001.Google Scholar Ghosh, Durba. Sex and the Family in Colonial India: The Making of Empire. Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Greenhalgh, Susan. Cultivating Global Citizens: Population in the Rise of China. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar Greenhalgh, Susan. Just One Child: Science and Policy in Deng’s China. Berkeley, ca: University of California Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Greenhalgh, Susan, and Winckler, Edwin A.. Governing China’s Population: From Leninist to Neoliberal Biopolitics. Stanford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar Hall, Lesley. The Life and Times of Stella Browne: Feminist and Free Spirit. London: I. B. Tauris, 2011.Google Scholar Hartmann, Betsy. Reproductive Rights and Wrongs: The Global Politics of Population Control and Contraceptive Choice. New York: Harper & Row, 1987.Google Scholar Heer, David M. “Abortion, contraception, and population policy in the Soviet Union.” Demography 2 (1965), 531–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Ho, Ping-ti. Studies on the Population of China, 1368–1953. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Jolly, Margaret. “Other mothers: material ‘insouciance’ and the depopulation debate in Fiji and Vanuatu, 1890–1930.” In Ram, Kalpana and Jolly, Margaret, eds., Maternities and Modernities: Colonial and Postcolonial Experiences in Asia and the Pacific. Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 177–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Koven, Seth, and Michel, Sonya, eds. Mothers of a New World: Maternalist Politics and the Origins of Welfare States. London and New York: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar Lee, James Z., and Feng, Wang. One Quarter of Humanity: Malthusian Mythology and Chinese Realities, 1700–2000. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar Marks, Lara. Sexual Chemistry: A History of the Contraceptive Pill. New Haven, ct: Yale University Press, 2001.Google Scholar May, John. World Population Policies: Their Origin, Evolution, and Impact. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar McCormick, Ted. William Petty and the Ambitions of Political Arithmetic. Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar McGregor, Russell. “‘Breed out the colour’ or the importance of being white.” Australian Historical Studies 33 (2002), 286–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar McNeill, J. R. “Population and the natural environment: trends and challenges.” Population and Development Review 32 (2006), 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar McNeill, William H. Population and Politics Since 1750. Charlottesville, va: University of Virginia Press, 1990.Google Scholar Meadows, Donella H., et al. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. London: Earth Island, 1972.Google Scholar Norgren, Tiana. Abortion Before Birth Control: The Politics of Reproduction in Postwar Japan. Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar Oakley, Deborah. “American–Japanese interaction in the development of population policy in Japan, 1945–52.” Population and Development Review 4:4 (1978), 617–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Petersen, William. “Marxism and the population question: theory and practice.” In Teitelbaum, Michael S. and Winter, Jay M., eds., Population and Resources in Western Intellectual Traditions. Cambridge University Press, 1989, pp. 77–101.Google Scholar Quine, M. S. “Racial ‘sterility’ and ‘hyperfecundity’ in fascist Italy: the biological politics of sex and reproduction.” Fascism 1 (2012), 92–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Rallu, Jean Louis. “From decline to recovery: the Marquesan population 1885–1945.” Health Transition Review 2:2 (1992), 177–194.Google Scholar Rao, Mohan. From Population Control to Reproductive Health: Malthusian Arithmetic. New Delhi: Sage, 2004.Google Scholar Robertson, Thomas. The Malthusian Moment: Global Population Growth and the Birth of American Environmentalism. New Brunswick, nj: Rutgers University Press, 2012.Google Scholar Ronsin, F. “Between Malthus and the social revolution: the French Neo-Malthusian movement.” In Dupâquier, J., Fauve–Chamoux, A., and Grebenik, E., eds., Malthus: Past and Present. London: Academic Press, 1983, pp. 329–339.Google Scholar Rusnock, Andrea. Vital Accounts: Quantifying Health and Population in Eighteenth-century England and France. Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Schayegh, Cyrus. “Eugenics in interwar Iran.” In Bashford, Alison and Levine, Philippa, eds., The Oxford Handbook of the History of Eugenics. Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 449–461.Google Scholar Silberman, Leo. “Hung Liang-Chi: a Chinese Malthus.” Population Studies 13:3 (1960), 257–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Smith, Neil. American Empire: Roosevelt’s Geographer and the Prelude to Globalization. Berkeley, ca: University of California Press, 2003.Google Scholar Stoler, Ann. “Sexual affronts and racial frontiers: European identities and the cultural politics of exclusions in colonial Southeast Asia.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 34:3 (1992), 514–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Szreter, Simon. “The idea of demographic transition and the study of fertility change: a critical intellectual history.” Population and Development Review 19:4 (1993), 659–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Thomas, Nicholas. “Sanitation and seeing: the creation of state power in early colonial Fiji.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 32 (1990), 149–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar UNFPA. “Linking population, poverty and development: analyzing the relationship between population and climate change.” www.unfpa.org/pds/climate/, accessed September 1, 2013. Wolfe, Patrick. “Land, labor, and difference: elementary structures of race.” American Historical Review 106:3 (2001), 866–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar What were the reasons for the rise in population 1750 1850?Population Growth
A main reason for this was 18th century agricultural improvements, which all but ended the periodic famines that had kept down European populations. From 1750 to 1850, the population of England alone nearly tripled.
What was the main cause of Europe's population increase between 1850 and 1880?With industrialization, improvements in medical knowledge and public health, together with a more regular food supply, bring about a drastic reduction in the death rate but no corresponding decline in the birth rate. The result is a population explosion, as experienced in 19th-century Europe.
Why did the population increase after 1750?From around 27% over the previous century, it reached 30% in the three decades from 1751 to 1781, 37% in the next three decades to 1811 and peaked at a 55% growth in the generation from 1811 to 1841. This was entirely the result of a high natural growth rate as fertility (the number of births) exceeded mortality.
What caused Europe's population to increase?Q: Why did the population increase in Europe during the Middle Ages? The population grew in medieval Europe largely due to climate change. As things warmed up, farms were able to produce more food, and people were able to circumvent diseases much easier.
|
What was the main factor governing population increase in Europe between 1750 and 1850?
zusammenhängende Posts
Urheberrechte © © 2024 nguoilontuoi Inc.
