main effect citizens united federal election commission quizlet

What was the main effect of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission quizlet?

Recommended textbook solutions

Politics in States and Communities

15th EditionSusan A. MacManus, Thomas R. Dye

177 solutions

American Government

1st EditionGlen Krutz

412 solutions

Criminal Justice in America

9th EditionChristina Dejong, Christopher E. Smith, George F Cole

105 solutions

American Corrections

11th EditionMichael D. Reisig, Todd R. Clear

160 solutions

Recommended textbook solutions

Politics in States and Communities

15th EditionSusan A. MacManus, Thomas R. Dye

177 solutions

American Government

1st EditionGlen Krutz

412 solutions

Politics in States and Communities

15th EditionSusan A. MacManus, Thomas R. Dye

177 solutions

American Corrections

11th EditionMichael D. Reisig, Todd R. Clear

160 solutions

By a 5-to-4 vote along ideological lines, the majority held that under the First Amendment corporate funding of independent political broadcasts in candidate elections cannot be limited. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote for the majority joined by Chief Justice John G. Roberts and Justices Antonin G. Scalia, Samuel A. Alito, and Clarence Thomas. Justice John Paul Stevens dissented, joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. Breyer, and Sonia Sotamayor. The majority maintained that political speech is indispensable to a democracy, which is no less true because the speech comes from a corporation. The majority also held that the BCRA's disclosure requirements as applied to The Movie were constitutional, reasoning that disclosure is justified by a "governmental interest" in providing the "electorate with information" about election-related spending resources. The Court also upheld the disclosure requirements for political advertising sponsors and it upheld the ban on direct contributions to candidates from corporations and unions.

In a separate concurring opinion, Chief Justice Roberts, joined by Justice Alito, emphasized the care with which the Court handles constitutional issues and its attempts to avoid constitutional issues when at all possible. Here, the Court had no narrower grounds upon which to rule, except to handle the First Amendment issues embodied within the case. Justice Scalia also wrote a separate concurring opinion, joined by Justices Alito and Thomas in part, criticizing Justice Stevens' understanding of the Framer's view towards corporations. Justice Stevens argued that corporations are not members of society and that there are compelling governmental interests to curb corporations' ability to spend money during local and national elections.

Recommended textbook solutions

Politics in States and Communities

15th EditionSusan A. MacManus, Thomas R. Dye

177 solutions

American Government

1st EditionGlen Krutz

412 solutions

Criminal Justice in America

9th EditionChristina Dejong, Christopher E. Smith, George F Cole

105 solutions

Government in America: Elections and Updates Edition

16th EditionGeorge C. Edwards III, Martin P. Wattenberg, Robert L. Lineberry

269 solutions

What was the outcome of Citizens United v Federal Election Commission quizlet?

The Court ruled, 5-4, that the First Amendment prohibits limits on corporate funding of independent broadcasts in candidate elections. The justices said that the government's rationale for the limits on corporate spending—to prevent corruption—was not persuasive enough to restrict political speech.

What was the outcome of Citizens United v FEC?

The Court ultimately held in this case that the anti corruption interest is not sufficient to displace the speech in question from Citizens United and that "independent expenditures, including those made by corporations, do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption."

Why was the Supreme Court case of Citizens United v Federal elections Commission significant quizlet?

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a US constitutional law case, in which the United States Supreme Court held that the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting political independent expenditures by corporations, associations, or labor unions.

What was the effect of the Supreme Court's ruling in the Citizens United case?

FEC (2003) that had upheld restricted corporate spending on "electioneering communications." The ruling effectively freed corporations (including incorporated non-profit organizations) to spend money on electioneering communications and to directly advocate for the election or defeat of candidates.

zusammenhängende Posts

Which of the following is most likely to be a beneficial effect of using meereader?
Why is it important that your heart rate and blood pressure increase as a stress response?
Which of the following describes the effect of global climate change on biodiversity?
Which of the following are the main considerations of creating a channel objective?
What is a single statement that refers to the main purpose and topic of the speech?
What are the main indicators that a patient would require oropharyngeal suctioning?
What was the main factor governing population increase in Europe between 1750 and 1850?
What is the main difference between a competitive firm and a monopoly firm quizlet?
What effect did nineteenth-century imperialism have on migration in colonized lands?
What are the main points of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen?

Toplist

Neuester Beitrag

Stichworte