OverviewUW Libraries has a whole guide, Savvy Info Consumers: Evaluating Information, which discusses different types of sources and how to approach evaluating their credibility/reliability. Show
What it means for a source to be credible/reliable can vary depending on the context of its use. Generally, a credible or reliable source is one that experts in your subject domain would agree is valid for your purposes. This can vary, so it is best to use one of the source evaluation methods that best fits your needs. Do remember that credibility is contextual! It is important to critically evaluate sources because using credible/reliable sources makes you a more informed writer. Think about unreliable sources as pollutants to your credibility, if you include unreliable sources in your work, your work could lose credibility as a result. FrameworksThere are certain frameworks that information professionals have put together to help people think critically about the information provided. Some of the methods that UW Libraries suggest are: 5 W Questions (5Ws): This method means thinking critically about each of your sources by answering five questions to determine if the source is credible/reliable. The acceptable answers to these questions will vary depending on your needs. The questions are:
SMART Check: This method is particularly good at evaluating newspaper sources. Like the 5Ws method it also involves answering critical questions about your source. The criteria are:
CRAAP Test: This method provides you with a set of criteria that make a source more or less credible. The criteria are:
Additional HelpIf you would like personalized support from UW Libraries on source evaluation you can
As a student, you will be gathering information from a variety of types of sources for your research projects including books, newspaper articles, magazine articles, specialized databases, and websites. As you examine each source, it is important to evaluate each source to determine the quality of the information provided within it. Common evaluation criteria include: purpose and intended audience, authority and credibility, accuracy and reliability, currency and timeliness, and objectivity or bias. Each of these criteria will be explained in more detail below. Purpose and intended audience
Authority and credibility
Accuracy and reliability
Currency and timeliness
Objectivity or bias
In Summary
Adapted from Burkhardt, J.M & MacDonald, M.C. (2010). Teaching information Literacy: 50 standards-based exercises for college students.Chicago: American Library Association. What questions should we ask when examining a primary source?First Ask These Questions. What is it?. Who wrote or made it?. When was it written or made?. Where was it written or made?. How was it written or made?. What evidence does this source contribute to my research?. What are some questions you should ask yourself when judging the quality of a primary source?Sample responses: Who created the source and why? Does the author or recorder have firsthand knowledge of the information or is the information secondhand? Does the author take a neutral stance or is was the information influenced by bias?
What questions do you need to ask to determine if a source is reliable?Critical questions. Who is the creator/author/source/publisher of the information? What are the author's credentials or affiliations?. Is the author's expertise related to the subject? Are they an authority on the topic through education, experience, or expertise in the field?. Whose voices/viewpoints are not being heard?. What are the 3 most important things to consider when analyzing a primary source?How to Analyze a Primary Source. Look at the physical nature of your source. ... . Think about the purpose of the source. ... . How does the author try to get the message across? ... . What do you know about the author? ... . Who constituted the intended audience? ... . What can a careful reading of the text (even if it is an object) tell you?. |