Author’s note: Are Darwin’s finches “a particularly compelling example of speciation” as well as “evolution in action”? In a series of posts, I offer some notes on the question of whether macroevolution is happening on the Galápagos Islands. Please find the full series here. Show
It may perhaps sound a bit confusing and contradictory when we read (Lamichhaney et al. in Nature 2015, referred to in my last post) that, “After a year of drought the finches with slightly larger beaks survived earlier than those with smaller beaks,” and also: “When the weather is dry, bigger-beaked birds do better. When the rain returns, smaller-beaked birds return to previous levels,” etc., and that during the time of the drought: “the researchers found that the large-beak HMGA2 variant was more common in birds that starved to death, while the small-beak variant was more common in birds that survived” (emphasis added). Solving the RiddleThe solution to the riddle? First phase (for the Wikipedia article, see here):
Second phase (for the Wikipedia article that is the source for this and subsequent quotations, see here):
Third phase:
Events Repeated?Now you would expect that the events that happened in 1977 would be repeated, namely:
But far from it. Instead, the following was observed:
Note the SubjunctiveWhy? The authors offer the following selectionist explanation, which is nevertheless uncertain. Note the repeated use of the subjunctive:
So, the situation concerning natural selection is not as simple as usually presented in the textbooks or in the later deleted comment of the National Academy of Sciences, which I discussed in the first two posts in this series. Rather, there are obviously important open questions yet to be solved, including the possible (not even mentioned above) effects of hybridization between Geospiza magnirostris and G. fortis. Nevertheless, even if the competition hypothesis between these two species were true, it would change the “Sisyphean evolution of Darwin’s finches” only with regard to its length and the number of its steps to fulfill the Sisyphean cycle. The more extensive but misleading claim of Peter and Rosemary Grant is that “selection oscillates in a direction.” Even if this doubtful assertion were true, it would ultimately be irrelevant for the origin of primary species and higher systematic categories. A sieve (natural selection), after all, cannot create new grains. Next, “Island Evolution of Species: Typogenesis, Typostasis or Typolysis?” Editor’s note: This article was updated on November 30, 2020. How did the medium ground finch population change after the drought?During 1977 there was a major drought on Daphne Major and many of the plants on the island produced few or no seeds. The medium ground finch population, which depends on seeds for food, declined drastically from about 1400 individuals to a few hundred in just over two years.
How did the population of medium ground finches on the island of Daphne Major change as the result of environmental change?How did the population of medium ground finches on the island of Daphne Major change as a result of environmental changes? drought occurred-> decrease in food supply->competition between finches-> loss of 80% medium finches.
What happened to the finches at Daphne Major?A severe drought in 1977 killed off many of Daphne's finches, setting the stage for the Grants' first major discovery. During the dry spell, large seeds became more plentiful than small ones. Birds with bigger beaks were more successful at cracking the large seeds.
What event occurred on Daphne Major in 1977 and reduced the medium ground finch population by 85 %?A major drought hit the island in 1977, and 85% of the birds died. Having big beak raised the odds of a bird surviving, because it meant the animal could crack the hard spiked seeds. The Grants discovered that within a few years the population of finches the recovered. But now their beaks were, on average, 4% deeper.
|